District Court case “requested and the judge agreed to provide the question bearing on the central issue in the case to the SJC for review to help ensure that the matters are resolved on uniform legal grounds,” Gaming Commission General Counsel Todd Grossman said Wednesday.

Superior Court is now before the Supreme Judicial Court on appeal, the parties in the U.S.

“This means Encore is stealing $85,440.00 from its customers each day, or well in excess of $30 million each year.”Įncore Boston Harbor has said the lawsuit is without merit and an initial 2019 Gaming Commission investigation into the allegation found that the casino was not violating any Gaming Commission rules or regulations and the commission has not taken any enforcement action.īecause a similar case against MGM Springfield that was dismissed by the Mass. Assuming an average wager of $50.00 per hand and 80 hands of Blackjack per hour, Encore’s customers can expect to lose $35.60 per hour more than the losses they are already expected to incur in a fair Blackjack game that complies with Massachusetts law,” the suit alleges. “While this may not sound significant, an analysis using conservative estimates and assumptions suggests that the aggregate loss to Massachusetts consumers is astounding. District Court in 2019 alleging that the Everett casino “brazenly stolen and will continue to steal” from customers by ignoring “established rules of the game of Blackjack to increase its statistical advantage and lower the lawful payouts owed to its customers.” The complaint takes specific issue with the Wynn Resorts casino paying out a blackjack - when a player is dealt an ace and any card having a point value of 10 - at 6-to-5 odds rather than at 3-to-2 odds. Gaming Commission decided Wednesday to work towards filing an amicus brief in a lawsuit that alleges Encore Boston Harbor has been duping customers by paying out at less favorable odds for blackjack wins after commissioners previously agreed amongst themselves that weighing in could give the perception that the regulators were siding with the casino they are meant to oversee.Īt issue is a class action complaint filed in U.S.

Casino in boston ma